Bernard Mandeville makes the following observation in the 'Preface' (1714) to his The Fable of the Bees, "every Moment must produce new Filth." Indeed, truer words have never been spoken.
Bernard Mandeville makes the following observation in the 'Preface' (1714) to his The Fable of the Bees, "every Moment must produce new Filth." Indeed, truer words have never been spoken.
(The following is by guest post author Rodney Herring, an assistant instructor in English and Rhetoric, whose weblog may be found here.)
What's up with the title The Wire? I mean, having a wire up provides the detectives with a kind of talismanic assurance, and the capacity to surveil their "targets" is fundamental to the Major Crime Unit's operations. Still, doesn't the title reflect an almost unsupported (and unearned) privileging of the police? The series is nearly unique and certainly daring in showing the ineptitude of the police, sometimes from external forces and sometimes from individual incompetence or corruption, so it's not particularly pro-BPD. Moreover, many of the episodes involve no wire at all, and plotlines such as the atrophy of the Baltimore port, the Stringer/Avon business/gangster showdown, and the Hopkins study of Tilghman Middle School all proceed smoothly with or without a wire. And yet, the show is called The Wire. Why?
That's one of the questions that has been on my mind since I began watching the series. Another has to do with what is far and away the most common evaluation I hear: "The Wire is the best television show. Ever." A couple of friends have muttered this dispassionately and a bit wearily, as though they've come to the conclusion (which they should have all along recognized as unavoidable) only after sustaining vigorous disputation from other fans. (One friend tried to sell the show to me by saying, "It's like Deadwood, but more relevant." Hmm.) In any case, at a certain point, I began to wonder about these people's judgments. Although I can't find any reason to say they're wrong, something still bothered me.
That point and that something roughly coincide with the end of Season 3. But I probably should have seen it coming, at least as early as this moment in All Due Respect (3.2):
Holy Shit. Time to visit Nairn's most necessary corrective once again, I guess.
For those of you unfamiliar with it, The Colbert Report is a fake news cable show hosted by the over the top, pseudo right wing commentator Stephen Colbert. While it may be simply described as a parody of cable political talk shows (like The O'Reilly Factor) it offers an ironic look at contemporary political discourse. What strikes me is that Colbert seems to be able to sum up the cultural and political divide with one word - Truthiness:
The A.V. Club: What's your take on the "truthiness" imbroglio that's tearing our country apart?
Stephen Colbert: Truthiness is tearing apart our country, and I don't mean the argument over who came up with the word. I don't know whether it's a new thing, but it's certainly a current thing, in that it doesn't seem to matter what facts are. It used to be, everyone was entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts. But that's not the case anymore. Facts matter not at all. Perception is everything. It's certainty. People love the president because he's certain of his choices as a leader, even if the facts that back him up don't seem to exist. It's the fact that he's certain that is very appealing to a certain section of the country. I really feel a dichotomy in the American populace. What is important? What you want to be true, or what is true?
A song I listened to recently put me in mind of Reverend Tim Haggard's situation.
The song is by the band 'Garbage.'
The title of the song is "Sex is not the enemy"
If current predictions hold, Republicans will need appropriate background music this coming Tuesday to help them emote in a way consonate with their new status. I would like to suggest the well-loved Albinoni Adagio in G Minor, for Organ and Strings. Turn on the TV, leave off the volume, and watch election returns with that in the background.
But what about other voters who are not Republicans? And even some Republicans who have decided the Bush Presidency has written checks its competence can't cash? Don't they need background music?
What's funniest about all of this "Path to 9/11" humbug: the 9/11 Commission Report was itself politically white-washed crock of shit. Sorry to spoil the party (and sign the petition, please*) but still someone had to say it.
*particularly if–like most LS lurkers–you are a centrist with any cred.
Update 9/10: Oh wouldn't you know it, "The Path to 9/11" is linked directly to David Horowitz (where does that man get all his money?):
Despicable socialist fantasies, or dedications to the memory of "political surrealism" in literary rag, n+1 (perhaps even those without subscriptions could, you know, opine about it). Anyway it reminded me of this. And there's some Hegel in the monster's tail. Mark Greif:
One of the lessons of starting a magazine today is that if you pay any attention to politics you will collect a class of detractors, who demand immediately to know What and Wherefore and Whether and How...Is it possible you have not endorsed a candidate, or adopted a party? Within the party, a position? If not a position, an issue? The notion that politics could be served by thinking about problems and principles, rather than rehearsing strategy, leaves them not so much bemused as furious.
Continue reading "He may as well be talking about weblogs" »
This is part 2 of a series of posts inspired by my recent family vacation to Florida. One of the hidden gems of the Sunshine State is the Salvador Dali Museum in St. Petersberg.
The history of the Museum's location deserves its own discussion, but suffice it to say that it was the brainchild of the local business community to establish a tourist attraction unlike any other in Florida. Before my visit I had always thought of Dali as the silly surrealist who loved publicity and making lots of money. In fact, Andre Breton had coined the nickname Avida Dollars (greedy for dollars) to emphasize his passion for fame and fortune. But having seen his work in person, I have a new found respect for not only the imagery but the masterful precision of his technique. He was truly a great talent, even if he spent a good part of his life waisting it.
What I also found fascinating was the reactionary nature of his politics and his ultimate expulsion from Breton's inner circle. The Enigma of William Tell (pictured above) could be described as

Recent Comments